What psychological perspective is thought to most explain Capgras delusion?

Prepare for the Clinical Neuropsychology Test with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations. Master the essentials and excel on your exam!

Multiple Choice

What psychological perspective is thought to most explain Capgras delusion?

Explanation:
Capgras delusion is often approached through a Freudian, psychodynamic lens. From this viewpoint, the belief that a familiar person has been replaced by an impostor can reflect unconscious conflicts and the ego’s defenses against anxiety. A key idea is that unacceptable feelings toward the loved one are projected outward, while a splitting defense keeps the image of the person intact on a cognitive level. This combination can produce the sense that the known person is present but somehow harboring a threatening alter ego, which becomes the impostor in the patient’s perception. In this light, the impostor serves as a container for those disowned feelings, allowing the individual to maintain a managed sense of self amid internal conflict. Other perspectives aren’t as well aligned with this type explanation: a Friedan-inspired view isn’t a standard clinical framework, behaviorist accounts struggle to account for a fixed, idiosyncratic delusion as opposed to observable behaviors, and humanistic approaches focus on self-actualization and subjective experience rather than the specific misidentification of a person.

Capgras delusion is often approached through a Freudian, psychodynamic lens. From this viewpoint, the belief that a familiar person has been replaced by an impostor can reflect unconscious conflicts and the ego’s defenses against anxiety. A key idea is that unacceptable feelings toward the loved one are projected outward, while a splitting defense keeps the image of the person intact on a cognitive level. This combination can produce the sense that the known person is present but somehow harboring a threatening alter ego, which becomes the impostor in the patient’s perception.

In this light, the impostor serves as a container for those disowned feelings, allowing the individual to maintain a managed sense of self amid internal conflict. Other perspectives aren’t as well aligned with this type explanation: a Friedan-inspired view isn’t a standard clinical framework, behaviorist accounts struggle to account for a fixed, idiosyncratic delusion as opposed to observable behaviors, and humanistic approaches focus on self-actualization and subjective experience rather than the specific misidentification of a person.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy